Keyword Analysis & Research: stevenson v mclean
Keyword Research: People who searched stevenson v mclean also searched
|stevenson v mclean||1.53||0.6||7361||58|
|stevenson v mclean 1880||0.37||1||4220||82|
|stevenson v mclean 1880 5 qbd 346||1.48||0.2||2095||56|
|stevenson v mclean case summary||0.41||0.8||4925||35|
|stevenson v mclean case||0.15||0.1||7380||44|
|stevenson v mclean section||0.11||0.6||9140||75|
|stevenson v mclean uk||0.08||0.5||1075||60|
|stevenson v mclean summary||1.97||0.9||5525||93|
|stevenson v mclean 1880 case summary||0.39||0.1||2115||43|
|stevenson jacques & co v mclean||0.36||0.3||501||1|
|stevenson jaques & co v mclean||0.35||0.2||3504||80|
|stevenson jacques and co v mclean||1.84||1||7831||20|
|stevenson jacques v mclean||1.5||0.7||7430||18|
|stevenson jacques co v mclean 1880||0.42||0.4||6099||82|
Frequently Asked Questions
Stevenson, Jaques, & Co v McLean  5 QBD 346 is an English contract law case concerning the rules on communication of acceptance by telegraph. Its approach contrasts to the postal rule . Plaintiffs (P) were iron merchants who purchased iron to sell on to third parties. Defendant (D) was the holder of warrants (titles) for quantities of iron.What was the defendant's offer to sell iron to Stevenson Jaques?
The defendant, Mclean, offered to sell iron to the complainant, Stevenson Jaques & Co. This was for the price of 40s and the offer would remain open until Monday. The complainant sent a telegram to the defendant, asking whether he would accept a payment of 40 over a two-month period, or what his longest limit would be for payment.How did McLean respond to the complainant's telegram?
The complainant sent a telegram to the defendant, asking whether he would accept a payment of 40 over a two-month period, or what his longest limit would be for payment. McLean did not respond to this telegram. The defendant sold the iron to another party, but did not inform the complainant of this action.